Why I am Convinced that Anna Ardin is just a Liar 2020
I will be somewhat upgrading and reposting this from 2012 since the conventional news have actually guaranteed extremely people that are few the information of this “case” against Julian Assange in Sweden. The UN performing Group ruled that Assange ought not to have already been arrested in the united kingdom in the beginning since there is no situation, with no investigation that is genuine. Look at this and also you shall know why.
One other thing maybe maybe perhaps not commonly grasped can there be isn’t any JURY in a rape test in Sweden and it’s also a SECRET TEST. Every one of the proof, every one of the witnesses, are heard in key. No public, no jury, no news. The actual only real part that is public the charging and also the verdict. There clearly was a judge and two advisers straight appointed by governmental events. Which means you never ever would get to comprehend just just how plainly the full instance is really a stitch-up. Unless you check this out.
You will find therefore inconsistencies that are many Anna Ardin’s accusation of intimate attack against Julian Assange. However the key question which leaps down I have not seen asked anywhere else – is this at me– and which strangely:
Why did Anna Ardin maybe perhaps not alert Sofia Wilen?
On 16 August, Julian Assange had sex with Sofia Wilen. Sofia had become understood when you look at the Swedish group around Assange for the shocking pink cashmere sweater she had used right in front row of Assange’s press seminar. Anna Ardin knew Assange had been intending to have intercourse with Sofia Wilen. On 17 August, Ardin texted a pal who was simply trying to find Assange:
“He’s maybe maybe not right here. He’s planned to possess intercourse aided by the girl that is cashmere night, although not managed to make it. Perhaps he finally discovered time yesterday? ”
Yet Ardin later testified that simply three days previously, on 13 August, she was in fact intimately assaulted by Assange; an assault therefore serious she had been prepared to decide to try (with great success) to ruin Julian Assange’s entire life. She has also been to mention that this attack included enforced non-safe sex and she had been worried about HIV.
If Ardin actually thought that on 13 August Assange had forced non-safe sex she make no attempt to warn Sofia Wilen that Wilen was in danger of her life on her and this could have transmitted HIV, why did? And just why had been Ardin talking about with Assange his desire for intercourse with Wilen, and texting about this to buddies, without any disapproval that is evident discouragement?
Ardin had Wilen’s contact information as well as had organised her enrollment for the press seminar. She may have warned her. But she didn’t.
Why don’t we fit that into a really brief survey associated with the entire relationship that is ardin/Assange.
11 August: Assange comes in Stockholm for a press seminar organised by way of a branch for the Social Democratic Party. Anna Ardin has provided her one sleep flat as she will be away for him to stay in.
13 August: Ardin comes home early. She’s dinner with Assange and they’ve got consensual intercourse, from the very first day’s conference. Ardin afterwards alleges this converted into attack by surreptitious mutilation associated with the condom.
14 August: Anna volunteers to behave as Julian’s press assistant. She sits close to him regarding the dais at their press meeting. Assange fulfills Sofia Wilen here.
‘Julian desires to head to a party that is crayfish anybody have a few available seats tonight or tomorrow? #fb’
This try to locate a crayfish celebration fails, therefore Ardin organises one herself for him, in a garden outside her flat. Anna and Julian appear good together. One visitor hears Anna rib Assange that she thought “you had dumped me” as he got up from sleep early that morning. Another proposes to Anna that Julian can keep her flat and come stick to them. She replies: “He can stick with me. ”
15 August Nevertheless during the party that is crayfish Julian, Anna tweets:
‘Sitting outside at 02:00 and scarcely freezing using the world’s coolest smartest people, it is amazing! #fb’
Julian and Anna, based on both their authorities testimonies, rest once more in identical solitary bed, and continue doing so for the following day or two. Assange tells police they continue steadily to have intercourse; Anna tells police they don’t. That Anna and Julian go together to, and leave together from, a dinner with the leadership of the Pirate Party evening. They again sleep into the same sleep.
16 August: Julian would go to have sexual intercourse with Sofia Wilen: Ardin will not alert her of possible assault that is sexual. Another buddy provides Anna to take control housing Julian. Anna once again declines.
20 August: After Sofia Wilen contacts her to say this woman is focused on STD’s including HIV after non-safe sex with Julian, Anna takes her to see Anna’s buddy, other personal Democrat user, previous colleague for a passing fancy ballot in a council election, and campaigning feminist officer, Irmeli Krans. Ardin informs Wilen the authorities can compel Assange to take an HIV test. Ardin sits in throughout Wilen’s unrecorded – in breach of procedure – police meeting. Krans makes a statement accusing Assange of rape. Wilen will not signal it.
21 August Having heard Wilen’s meeting and Krans’ statement from this, Ardin makes her very own police declaration alleging Assange has surreptiously had sex that is unprotected her eight times formerly.
Some times later on: Ardin creates a broken condom towards the authorities as proof; but a forensic assessment finds no traces of Assange’s – xhamsterlive.com or anyone else’s – DNA upon it, as well as it’s apparently unused.
No witness has arrived ahead to express that Ardin complained of intimate attack by Assange before Wilen’s interview that is ardin-arranged Krans – and Wilen arrived ahead to not ever grumble of a assault, but check into STDs. Wilen declined to sign the declaration alleging rape, that has been used by Ardin’s friend Krans in Ardin’s existence.
Hence simple that certain of a few things occurred:
Ardin ended up being intimately assaulted with non-safe sex, but neglected to warn Wilen whenever she knew Assange would definitely see her in hope of intercourse.
Ardin also proceeded to host Assange, assist him, can be found in general general public and personal with him, work as his press assistant, and rest in identical bed with him, refusing duplicated offers to allow for him elsewhere, all after he assaulted her.
Ardin desired intercourse with Assange – from whatever motive. She “unexpectedly” came back home early after providing him the application of her one sleep flat while she had been away. By her very own admission, she had consensual sex with him, within hours of fulfilling him.
She discussed with Assange his desire for sex with Wilen, and seems at the very least to not have been discouraging. Hearing of Wilen’s concern about HIV after non-safe sex, she took Wilen to her campaigning friend that is feminist policewoman Irmeli Krans, so that you can twist Wilen’s tale as a sexual assault – really easy provided Sweden’s astonishing “second-wave feminism” rape guidelines. Wilen declined to signal.
In the police section on 20 August, Wilen texted a pal at 14.25 “did not require to place any fees against JA nevertheless the authorities wished to get a handle on him. ”
At 17.26 she texted because I only wanted him to take a test” that she was “shocked when they arrested JA.
The evening that is next 22.22 she texted “it had been law enforcement whom fabricated the charges”.
Ardin then made her very own tale of intimate attack. As numerous buddies knew she ended up being making love with Assange, she could maybe maybe not claim sex that is non-consensual. Therefore she manufactured her tale to squeeze in with Wilen’s issues by alleging the event regarding the condom that is torn. However the condom that is torn produced doesn’t have trace of Assange onto it. It really is impractical to wear a condom and never keep a DNA trace.
No difficulty is had by me in stating that We securely think Ardin to be always a liar. On her behalf tale to be real involves acceptance of behavior that will be, into the sense that is literal amazing.
Ardin’s tale is needless to say extremely poor, but that doesn’t matter. Firstly, you had been never likely to see all of this detail. Rape studies in Sweden take place completely in secret. There isn’t any jury, while the national federal federal federal government appointed judge is flanked by assessors appointed straight by governmental events. If Assange would go to Sweden, he’ll disappear completely into prison, the trial will likely to be key, while the the next thing you will definitely hear is the fact that he is accountable and a rapist.
Next, needless to say, no matter the data is indeed poor, as merely to cry rape would be to tarnish a man’s reputation forever. Anna Ardin has recently succeeded in destroying most of the work and life of Assange. The main points associated with the tale being pathetic is unimportant.
By crying rape, politically proper viewpoint falls in behind the line that it’s incorrect even to check out the data. That she worked with CIA-funded anti-Castro groups in Havana and Miami if you are not allowed to know who the accuser is, how can you find out?
Finally, to those of good use idiots whom declare that the best way to test these things is in court, i might state needless to say, you will be right, we must trust their state constantly, fit-ups never happen, and now we should absolutely condemn the disgraceful behavior of the whom campaigned for the Birmingham Six.